2002-05-09 - 6:27 p.m.
okay, i've been looking at both news paper articles on the journalism contests and i noticed one really fucked up thing... both papers say that the best news paper is the Governor. granted that the governor has a nice looking paper, but the Advertiser and the Bullettin both say that its the best paper in the state. that's a load of shit. the governor is not the best paper in the state because it didn't win a single award for its writting. not a single fucking award for a single fucking story it wrote. how can a fucking paper be labled "best in the state" if it's fucking writing sucks?
okay, i'm not saying the rough rider should win the title, because i was looking at the papers that one of the judges marked up, and he did have good points, we dont make efficient use of our white space. but that still doesn't mean the governor should be labled best in the fucking state just because they use big fucking pictures.
shit... i'm all angry now. i think i should go driving or something later on.
maybe i'll write an angry letter to the advertiser...
maybe i'll go jack off later.
maybe a lot of things...
�
�
